PRIMARY STRUCTUREmasterclassRegular or Super, 2023 LOGIN

table of content

Brief

Research

PRIMARY STRUCTURES

ANALYSIS

JURY

“I have tried to make complex things with simplicity, and I will leave it up to you to judge if I have not succeeded. In any case, I have tried, intensely.”    (Aldo Pio Favini)

During his time as a student, Aldo Favini, a structural engineer and the son of a real estate developer, crossed paths with the Italian architect Angelo Mangerotti. This encounter would go on to shape their professional relationship in the years to come. As their collaboration deepened, architect and engineer became an inseparable team, working together on numerous projects. They shared a fascination for solving complex engineering problems with simplicity.

“A few years after the project of the structures of the church of Baranzate, Arch. Angelo Mangiarotti asked me to design a structure for an industrial building. Thinking back on the church of Baranzate, I realized I had designed a classical type of structure, nothing new, that is. Exactly four pillars, two main beams, five secondary beams and tiles to complete it…” (Aldo Pio Favini)

When considering the projects of both architect and engineer the same structural type of the cantilevered slab is used to make a church, a pavilion, a gas station and a residential apartment block.

While refueling at a gas station, I noticed its resemblance to the designs by Mangiarotti and Favini. Acknowledging that our generation will be the last reliant on fossil fuels, gas stations now symbolize obsolescence. As we transition to solar-powered transportation, the question arises: how should we address these remnants of the past? Should we demolish them, erasing their memory, or appreciate them for what they are — an intriguing, flexible structural type — a slab supported by four points

These humble structures possess cultural references worth exploring. For instance, the 2004 documentary ‘Regular or Super,’ featuring the work of Mies Van Der Rohe, includes a simple gas station near Montreal amidst his renowned masterpieces. Equally captivating is the artist publication ’26 Gas Stations’ by Ed Ruscha, a book showcasing exactly what its title suggests: 26 examples of the same type. Through its straightforward arrangement, the book unveils the countless variations within the type—always similar, yet never identical.

 

Brief

In this studio, we will delve into all the gas stations in Flanders. We will meticulously map them, conduct comparisons, and gain a comprehensive understanding of their functionality. Our aim is to compile an archive and establish the boundaries of this particular structural type.

Following this analysis, students will collaborate in pairs to repurpose a former gas station, engaging in the creative process of reimagining and adapting the structure while considering its architectural and structural characteristics.

Research

PRIMARY STRUCTURES

fig A Double single-column holding hands
fig B Double single-column holding hands
fig A Double canopy sharing two columns and leaning on a building
fig B Double canopy sharing two columns and leaning on a building
fig A Double canopy sharing two of the four columns and leaning on a building
fig B Double canopy sharing two of the four columns and leaning on a building
fig A Nearly identical two column canopies, apart from column position
fig B Nearly identical two column canopies, apart from column position
fig A Double and single column canopy standing side by side
fig B Double and single column canopy standing side by side
fig A 5/5 columns
fig B 5/5 columns
fig A Kleine structuur.
fig B Kleine structuur.
fig A Kleine structuur.
fig B Kleine structuur.
fig A Kleine structuur.
fig B Kleine structuur.
fig A Kleine structuur.
fig B Kleine structuur.
fig A Kleine structuur.
fig B Kleine structuur.
fig A 3/5 columns
fig B 3/5 columns
fig A 2/5 columns
fig B 2/5 columns
fig A 1/5 columns
fig B 1/5 columns
fig A ^^
fig A ^^^
fig A –^-
fig A ———-
fig A ^^^^^^^
fig A Aansluitende structuur, Jarne en Mike
fig A Aansluitende structuur, Jarne en Mike
fig A Aansluitende structuur, Jarne en Mike
fig A Aansluitende structuur, Jarne en Mike
fig A asymmetric gas station Binche, Jasmien en Robbe
fig A asymmetric gas station Geel, Jasmien en Robbe
fig B asymmetric gas station Geel, Jasmien en Robbe
fig A asymmetric gas station Binche, Jasmien en Robbe
fig B asymmetric gas station Binche, Jasmien en Robbe
fig A Fig A.vrije planvorm – Yunus en Ouassim
fig B Fig A.vrije planvorm – Yunus en Ouassim
fig C Fig A.vrije planvorm – Yunus en Ouassim
fig D Fig A.vrije planvorm – Yunus en Ouassim
fig A Fig A.vrije planvorm – Yunus en Ouassim
fig A asymmetric gas station dendermonde, Jasmien en Robbe
fig B asymmetric gas station dendermonde, Jasmien en Robbe
fig A asymmetric gas station diest, Jasmien en Robbe
fig A asymmetric gas station Laakdal, Jasmien en Robbe
fig A Expressieve daken_1
fig A Expressieve daken_2
fig A Expressieve daken_3
fig A 5/5 columns
fig A 4/5
fig A 3/5 columns
fig A 2/5 columns
fig A 1/5 columns
fig A Wood Double Column
fig A Brick Centre Column
fig A Brick
fig A addition
fig A Gasstation Kortemark
fig B Gasstation Kortemark
fig A Gasstation Blue Kortrijk
fig B Gasstation Blue Kortrijk
fig A Gasstation Blue Kortrijk
fig B Gasstation Blue Kortrijk
fig A Gasstation Doel
fig A Gasstation Buggenhout
fig B Gasstation Buggenhout
fig A Gasstation typology 12345
fig A Gasstation typology cut
fig A Facadism
fig B Facadism
fig C Facadism
fig D Facadism
fig E Facadism

ANALYSIS

JURY